“Loneliness has followed me my whole life, everywhere. In
bars, in cars, sidewalks, stores, everywhere. There’s no escape. I’m God’s
lonely man.”
-- Travis Bickle, Taxi Driver (1976)
“What if my problem wasn’t that I don’t understand people
but that I don’t like them?”
-- Louis Bloom, Nightcrawler (2014)
The aforementioned quotes depict the fundamental difference
between the lead characters of Scorcese’s seminal masterpiece “Taxi Driver” (1976) and
Dan Gilroy’s media satire “Nightcrawler” (2014). Yet, we found critics and
movie-lovers finding a thread that connects these two characters. May be
because the way Jake Gyllenhaal imbued De Niro’s vigor into his Bloom
character, or may be because the way they fashioned themselves, with that
ghoulish, hollow-eyed look. But, still what makes Louis Bloom of ‘Night
Crawler’ a companion to Travis Bickle rather than Norman Bates (“Psycho”) or
Patrick Bateman (“American Psycho”)?
Travis and Louis are loners as well as losers, and they both
descend into the vortex of lunacy as the respective movie narratives proceed. But, most importantly
they are marred products (a subjective view in the case of Louis Bloom) of their
time. Although, both Taxi Driver and Nightcrawler don’t shed light into their
protagonist’s childhood, we can easily attribute their senseless behavior to
the societal cesspit rather than an abusive childhood. “Someday a real rain
will come and wash all this scum off the streets”, utters Travis Bickle
conceding his view of New York of the seventies, the era when America was
lacerated politically, culturally, and economically. Louis Bloom shows us the
worst things that could come out of consumer capitalism and the voyeuristic, fame
culture.
However, the way these two characters react to these
defective affairs is where we could find glaring difference in their character
arc. Travis is a loner because he doesn’t seem to grasp the ways of interacting
with people.He struggles even to make small talk. On the other hand, Bloom
chooses to be a loner, but at the same time he has great verbal skills, enough
to manipulate people to do his bidding. Both these guys are angry and want to find something;
something that might make them feel like ‘somebody’. Travis searches that
'something' through the humans he encounters. When all his attempts fail he transforms
himself into a man who stood up (“Listen, you fuckers, you screw-heads. Here is a
man who would not take it anymore. A man who stood up against the scum, the
cunts, the dogs, the filth, the shit. Here is a man who stood up”).
Louis Bloom finds what he wants earlier in the movie. He
feels serendipity at watching those ‘stringers’ and that gruesome accident. As
he doesn’t want to do anything with humans (except to manipulate) he seeks money
or fame. But, at later point, we get to know that even money isn’t the driving
point for this guy. He wants fame. He wants to hold the power of media, wanting
to manipulate the events in a way that would increase the ratings. Bloom is
also intelligent in the way he handles the looming police investigation and his
partners’ threat. Many would read Bickle as stupid since he takes his
girlfriend to a porn film. But, Bickle is equally intelligent and his clumsy
actions should be looked through his psychological setbacks. But, both these
guys’ intelligence is somehow directly proportionate to the way they handle
their lunacy.
Bloom is a bad guy right from the start. His insanity only
deepens his subsequent amorality. While Bickle, far from being a good guy, possesses a
high moral sense, or at least a conscience. Bickle self-destructs himself as he
descends into insanity. But, Bloom’s insanity is more or less like a missile launcher often looking for targets to annihilate. If Bickle is a man who stood up against
evil in a psychopathic manner, Bloom is a stand-up guy who wants to divulge his
evil methods. The way Bloom quotes the business gurus words like religious
scriptures reflects our society’s warped view of success (“Who am I? I am a
hard worker. I set high goals”). Perhaps, the most significant point
“Nightcrawler” conveys is that you need to have a little bit of insanity to
stay above your competition or in your field.
For both Bickle and
Bloom, television represents a promising alternate reality. Bickle partly
resents and envies the people he sees in television because those characters
don’t seem to have any problem in developing relationships. The TV is the only thing
that transmits feelings, but when that (TV) breaks in one of “Taxi Driver’s” vital
scenes, Bickle’s self-control totally disintegrates. Bloom says to Nina,
looking at a huge wallpaper of L.A. in night-lights that the setting looks more
real in TV. So, he is attracted to this virtual reality, but the era he was
born in, urges him to be a player rather than a simple observer. The inherently
vile and manipulative nature of Lou Bloom also points him to achieve that
stage. The ‘God’s lonely man’ felt agonizing pain by watching other people’s
happiness in TV, whereas the 'night-crawling stringer’ was elated to look at other people’s
agony.
On the whole, I felt “Taxi Driver” is the masterpiece that laid
the path for the existence of good movies like “Night Crawler”. Personally, I am
very skeptical about “Nightcrawler” standing the test of time like ‘Taxi Driver’. And of course the performances of Robert de Niro and Jake Gyllenhaal in these films give us one more valid reason to hate the Oscars.
6 comments:
Finally an article that compares the two enigmatic characters without creating much fuss. Travis Bickle is an iconic movie character because of the conflicts of his psyche... he is not an evil character by default. His increasingly violent behavior is a reaction of the hypocrisy that engulfs him. Louis Bloom, however, is a reprobate and a psychopath. Also, I second you in your assessment of the Academy's myopic tendencies in deciding over the nominees and the winners.
Brilliantly summed up Arun..
great piece of writing.
@ Murtaza Ali, thanks for the comment. Yeah Lou Bloom is a despicable guy from the start. Many have also cited his behavior as borderline autistic.
@ Amrit Rukhaiyaar, thanks for the appreciation.
whoa.. what an analysis!! have you seen or reviewed 'Insomnia'.. would like ur analysis of Robin williams character and Al pacino's..
@ Roohi, thanks for the comment.
Here is the review on Insomnia. But, it's just a short one; not a detailed analysis on the character sketch. Perhaps I would like to do it after watching it one more time
http://movieretrospect.blogspot.in/2012/04/insomnia-nolans-psychodrama.html
Is it a coincidence that I saw both these movies last night" and an even bigger coincidence that I happened upon this blog looking for a reference image to make fan art
Post a Comment