American indie film-maker Tamara Jenkins’ debut feature The
Slums of Beverly Hills (1998) opens with the scene of an adolescent girl being
fitted for a bra. Now two decades later, Jenkins in her third feature-film
Private Life (2018) opens with the shot of a woman in her
knickers waiting for her husband to inject hormones. These might sound
like normal yet extremely private occasions. But more than the sense of having
intruded into someone’s private space, there’s a feeling that we are looking at
some secret, embarrassing thing which our societal norms, for some dubious
reasons, considers it a taboo subject. And through this jolt of ‘secret’
normalcy, Jenkins not only establishes the unseen female perspective, but also
sets up the narrative course. If Slums of Beverly Hills’ ‘bra-fitting’
establishes the character of a poor girl tentatively coming to terms with her
adolescent body, Private Life’s ‘hormone injection’ unveils a middle-aged
couple’s burning desire for having a child which makes them painfully navigate the
infertility industry. Moreover, both these features are loosely based on
episodes or experiences from Jenkins’ own life.
The director’s second film The Savages (2007) revolves
around two siblings caring for their dementia-afflicted father. Like Savages,
Private Life also looks at the ignored dimensions of family dynamics without
wrapping it under the comforting layers of sentimentality. Furthermore, both
these films share the humiliations and absurdities of modern medical
procedures. In Private Life’s case, it’s the complex world of assisted
reproduction. Rachel (Kathryn Hahn) and Richard (Paul Giamatti) are middle-aged
Manhattan couple trying to have child for a long time. The painful nightly
shots Rachel receives, the hospital room full of sad-faced waiting couples,
Rachel wandering the cold clinic halls in thin gowns and small shower caps, the
awkwardly jovial doctor (Dennis O’Hare) carrying out the procedure, the porn
video intended to enable Richard’s sperm delivery, the plaintive feeling as all
of these fail, and finally clinging to hope offered by an entirely different,
exhausting as well as more expensive medical procedure. Richard and Rachel have been
going through this cycle for years, the costs claiming almost all of their nest
eggs.
Richard even borrows from his brother Charlie (John Caroll Lynch) for an emergency procedure, which makes Charlie’s second wife Cynthia
(Molly Shannon) rant, “They’re like fertility junkies! … They’ve been doing
this for years! They need to stop.” Richard and Rachel are also open to
adoption, but those attempts have taken them nowhere. The failures and
disappointments do indeed take a psychological toll and makes it difficult to
deal with other people. At one occasion, they hide in their apartment from
responding to ‘trick-or-treaters’ knocking at the door. The feelings of being
left out while gazing at other normal family unit haunts them. The
'fist-bumping' doctor, however, suggests the couple to consider using an egg
donor. Rachel is appalled by this, but she slowly comes around, browsing
through the websites and looking at thumbnail pics of possible egg donors.
When Richard’s step-niece Sadie (Kayli Carter) – Cynthia’s
first daughter by another marriage – lands on his couch for a brief stay, the
couple decides to ask Sadie to donate her eggs. A medical counselor
unflinchingly reminds Richard and Rachel that ‘it wouldn’t be incest’ since the
25-year-old Sadie isn’t a blood relative. Sadie is a flighty, impulsive girl
aspiring to be a professional writer. She looks up to Richard for his
avant-garde theater works and Rachel for being an acclaimed short-fiction writer.
She calls them her ‘artistic parents’ and loves them for not being judgmental,
unlike Cynthia who abhors Sadie’s decision to dropout and complete college in
‘absentia’. Always eager to please Richard and Rachel, Sadie immediately warms
up to the idea of donating eggs and even finds a new sense of purpose in being
an egg donor. But of course more obstacles and complications arise, making the
fatigued couple to ask some toughest questions about their married life.
If there’s one thread
that unites Tamara Jenkins’ three features, it is her examination of (naturally)
changing bodies and the constant insecurities arising from it. A teenager
growing breasts, an old man dying of dementia, and the issue of fertility
plaguing a couple are all precisely and introspectively detailed by observing
the characters’ cultural, social milieu which paves way to certain hidden anxieties.
Interestingly, the weightiness of such themes is cleverly dispersed through
Jenkins’ well-staged and written seriocomic episodes that make us laugh while
also subtly conveying the underlying sadness of the situation. Much of Private
Life’s humor comes from bitter emotions and the awkwardness with which the
couples circumvent the alleged taboo subjects. When Richard requests Rachel to
consider a egg donor, saying, ‘they do it with farm animals all the time’,
Rachel explodes, “Well, I'm not a goat!”. Rachel’s fury over Richard’s
suggestion to take a painting from their apartment leads to another hilariously embarrassing episode. Nevertheless, the comedic moments never sounds
sitcom-like, partly because Jenkins’ writing brings forth an authentic, lived-in
feel. She walks a fraught emotional tightrope, never overplaying the character
quirks for unintended laughs.
The other half of the
credit goes to the lively dynamics between Hahn and Giamatti, both of them
laying out Richard and Rachel’s private joys and pains with such profundity. They
are so good at playing this normal, flawed couple that we rarely catch them
‘acting’. Newcomer Kayli Carter as Sadie is a spectacular addition to the cast.
She authentically captures the sense of bafflement accompanying the much
energetic yet anxious modern youths. There’s nothing much to nitpick in
Jenkins’ storytelling. Her unsettling glimpse into the messiest parts of modern
life and refusal to yield to the conventional cinematic notions of closure often cuts
too close to home. Eventually, Private Life (123 minutes) isn’t just about the
excruciating experiences of a couple fighting infertility, but also opens
conflicted feelings about a society or culture that obsesses over parenthood (especially
motherhood), making it the ultimate goal of (women’s) life. Tamara Jenkins
showcases one couple stuck on this cycle of longing, heartbreak, and hope as if
they are persistently moving through a revolving door while the destination of
parenthood on the other side remains ever-elusive.
1 comment:
Nice review.
Post a Comment