It could be said that irrationality is one of vital elements for creating terror on-screen. The existence of irrational behavior does frighten us. However, in most of horror genre flicks, the irrational acts are carried out by supernatural beings –Werewolf, vampires, alien monsters, ghosts etc. Then we also have the mad scientists, serial killers & slashers, who belong to our human race, but the dark overtones of those characters often, paint them as a human-faced monster. Dutch film-maker George Sluizer’s “The Vanishing" aka “Spoorloos” (1988) depicts irrational & obsessed behavior of two individuals and one among them is a dreadful killer. But, “Spoorloos” is neither a ‘jump-off-your-seat’ scary film nor a hair-rising thriller. The terror the film imbues on our mind is more psychological and philosophical. The evil is depicted in the movie is methodical, trained and even rehearsed.
A typical film on sociopathic personalities shows the
individual committing the brutal, murderous act (“How”), then some intelligent
investigator uncovers the ‘why’ and finally the script zeroes-in on ‘who’. But,
“The Vanishing” totally reverses this order. ‘Who’ is revealed earlier, whereas
‘why’ is gradually explained from the killer’s perspective. And ‘how’ isn’t as
complex as a Keigo Hagashino novel (“Devotion of Suspect X”). So, the basic
setup here is fairly simple and accessible (can be enjoyed at a superficial
level) without any mind-bending mystery. At the same time those who want to dig
deeper into the film’s subtle notes will find a lot of contemplative questions.
“The Vanishing” was based on Tim Krabbe’s novel “The Golden Egg” (the novelist
wrote the film’s screenplay) and opens with a young Dutch couple, Rex Hofman (Gene Bervoets) and Saskia Watger (Johanna ter Steege), embarking on their cycling
holiday in France.
It is suggested that this trip a major step in their
relationship. Like any other couple, Rex and Saskia tell jokes, laugh and often
say ‘love you’. Saskia talks about her recurring dream in which she is trapped
in a golden egg, adrift in space. She says that in her recent dream she also
saw Rex trapped in a golden egg, which is close to her. Later, the bickering
starts when their car sputters to a stop in the middle of a long tunnel. But,
soon Rex and Saskia are standing below a tree with smiles, burying two golden coins.
Rex promises that he would never abandon her. The elated Saskia goes into a
large gas station to buy drinks for the last leg of their trip. Rex waits,
takes some photographs, and then waits for a long time. He shows Saskia’s
photograph and asks if anyone has seen her. One says that she was talking to a
man, while other guy says that she got into a car.
Rex goes into the full panic mood and realizes that she has
been kidnapped. The police ask him to wait at least till morning and are 100
percent that it is a domestic squabble. She might have got fed up and left him.
But then, we know that’s not possible: Saskia seems to be truly in love with
Rex; and there is a bespectacled middle-aged man with a fractured man scanning
Saskia’s movements. We meet Raymond Lemorne (Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu), the man
who possibly abducted Saskia. But, he doesn’t look like a perpetrator. He lives
in material comfort with his wife and two lovely daughters. It is soon evident
that the methodical Raymond is planning to abduct a random young woman. We don’t
know ‘why’, but after endless rehearsals and dull planning, we see Raymond
standing on the gas station, looking at attractive Saskia.
Spoilers Ahead
Donnadieu’s Rayomond
is one of cinema’s rare self-satisfied sociopath with an unearthly calm. The most
shocking thing about Raymond is not that he has a loving family, but the organized
way he works to attain his evil achievement. Raymond neither bears any
psychological bruises nor has hidden assortment of murderous weapons in his
basement. His means for murder are a desolated guest house, chloroform, and a
stopwatch. In the later part of the movie, we have an answer to why Raymond plans
his evil deed in this manner. As a man of science, he just applies the same
principle: he develops a basic idea, then ponders over it, and conducts
incessant dry runs before acting upon. The tension and elation we see in Donnadieu’s
face is a bit more disturbing than the ones we saw in the faces of Christian
Bale (“American Psycho”) or Choi Min-sik (“I Saw the Devil”) because here, the
perpetrator approaches the evil act as just another one of his intelligent
pursuit. Unlike, other on-screen ruthless killers, Raymond isn’t acting out an
impulse to do evil; he is just checking whether he is capable of doing such
savage things.
Obsession is one of the main themes in “Spoorloos”. Rex’s obsession is driven by his emotions (love), whole Raymonds’ is driven by his
intellect. One could be considered good and the other evil, but the script from
Tim Krabbe juxtaposes the obsessive behavior meticulously, which complicates
the simple issues of evil and good. Rex isn’t a muscle-bound guy on the path of
vengeance. He just wants to know about Saskia’s fate and wants to keep up that
promise he made when he buried the coins. Earlier, in the movie, Rex abandons Saskia
inside the tunnel to get gas for his car. She cries out his name to leave her
in the dark, but Rex walks off with a little smile. Later, he says that “In the
tunnel, when you called for me (as he was walking away), I felt that I loved
you more than ever”. These words subtly suggests on Rex’s mindset and his never-ceasing
obsession. On the other hand, for Raymond, his obsession is just a grand
philosophical thought or another milestone to be achieved within the tedious
middle-class life.
The darkly comic and ironic twists moments are aplenty in “The
Vanishing”. Rex says to his new girlfriend Lieneke that if, given the choice,
he would assume Saskia is dead, and would give all to know what happened. Rex’s
words takes on an ironic twist in the end, when he consciously chooses his own
death. Throughout the film, Raymond gets new ideas and furthers upon his evil
plan, whenever he is having a good time with his family. An act of heroism, a
birthday party gift, and eventually the family photo resting on the dashboard
of the car helps Raymond to attain his fixation.
Upon its release, Director George Sluizer’s visual motifs were
said to be compared with best works of Alfred Hitchcock. Although Sluizer never
became an established stylist like Hitchcock, he does imbue some wonderful &
striking visual themes. Circular objects signifying Saskia’s dream about golden
eggs constantly recur in the film. The dream suggests how the couples’ fates
are linked. The adjoining golden coins under the tree reminisces Rex of that
dream and makes him to take the most irrational decision. Saskia also says that
in the dream they are in separate golden eggs, but not touching. The film’s
final image showcases a newspaper report about Rex and Saskia, whose pictures
are in ovals, side by side, not touching. The visual motifs sort of tell the
viewer that Rex buried alive inside the coffin isn’t some clever twist ending,
but only an inevitable one. The film-maker also subtly suggests on why Raymond
has chosen this method of killing in one brief sequence with the traffic
police. The shocking ending might have now lost its novelty by now, because Hollywood
and other film fraternities have repeatedly used it in some deplorable escapist
fares. But, “The Vanishing” is not a film like “Usual Suspects” or “The Prestige”,
where knowing the ending just spoils the experience.
“The Vanishing” (107 minutes) is a darkly compelling study
about human curiosity, obsession, and selfishness. It plunges into the mindset
of a sociopathic personality without exhibiting the usual genre manipulations.
Trailer
3 comments:
Great review. Sounds like my kind of movie. Adding it to my 'to be watched' list... :-)
That sounds quite intriguing.. Such movies are scary to me :)
Great review, will try watching it today!
Post a Comment