The protagonist of the movie “Groundhog Day” (1993),
weatherman Phil (Bill Murray) finds his life stuck in a single day, where the
events and conversations happen again and again at the exact same time. The
film jokingly and reflectively made a comment on our routine life. The Spider-man in Marc Webb’s “The Amazing Spiderman 2” has similarly got stuck with an
ordinary course: he woos his girl friend, cries with aunt and faces more and
more badass villains. He is not only caught in his own web, but also not aware
of that fact. And, we don’t care about this Spider-man routine, as long as the
special effects are good. These well-presented, skyscraper-jumping actions are
the only thing that keeps the shine in this franchise. Rest of the overcooked
melodrama can be added to Spidey’s villain lists. Nonetheless, this is not a
noise machine or premature like the previous Marc Webb offering.
The story starts with a newly invented back story in which
Peter Parker’s genius father (Campbell Scott) works as a genetic researcher for
Oscorp. The dangerous researchers of the MNC try to put Richard Parker
inventions into the hands of nefarious men. He destroys what they are looking
for and flees with his wife, gaining Oscorp’s wrath. Richard’s attempt to
escape goes futile when he has mid-flight fight with a killer. The finely
rendered sequence is all but identical to a dozens of scenes from other films,
but it still looks greats to watch on-screen. In the present day, grown up Peter
Parker, played by thirty year old Andrew Garfield, chases a regular bad guy
through the urban jungles of Manhattan. In the chase, he saves a
mild-mannered Spider-man fanatic, Max Dillon (Jamie Foxx), who works in the
engineering department of Oscorp.
He was treated like dirt and has no friends. Later, this
some guy embraces a live power line and falls into the tank of electric eels
and gets ‘reborn’ as "Electro." Peter’s relationship with his omnipresent
blonde girlfriend Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone) hangs in the middle, since he doesn’t
want to put her in danger. He sulks in the rooftops, and argue over and over on
how much they love each other. Another tedious part is the big, melodramatic
speeches by Aunt May. Meanwhile, there is also Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) –
Peter’s childhood friend, who returns to town after his father’s death. He
takes over Oscorp, much to the dismay of the executives and has a reunion with
Peter. The bratty and over-ambitious corporate heir needs some magical spider
venom for his disease. He eventually gets some, which turns him into ‘Green
Goblin.’ After a climatic electrical fight sequences, the films leads up to
inevitable “The Amazing Spider-Man 3.”
Garfield and Stone display some nicely modulated chemistry.
Garfield, although old enough to play a Peter, he turns himself uncannily into
a gangly teenager. Talented actors like Paul Gimatti, Sally Field, Chris Cooper
and Felicity Jones have perfectly played their pay-check roles. Jamie Foxx’s
‘Electro' only recalls the ‘Sandman’ character in ‘Spider-man 3’, who even
though is the main villain only adds a variety to fight sequence. He is just a
noisy confusion rather than a menace. ‘Green Goblin’ and ‘Rhino’ appear too
late in the movie and so for the rest of the running time, we are left alone
with a meandering screenplay that floats here and there.
Today’s comic hero movies are traveling beyond the yearnings of hard-core fan
boys, trying to refresh or subvert franchise expectations, but there is nothing
of that kind in this venture. Marc Webb’s direction isn’t as nimble as the
first film. There are some great moments, but every scene feels like it goes on
for at least one beat too long. Obviously, the film belongs to computer graphic
artists. The beautiful slow-motions, where Spider-Man soars above the Manhattan
streets is a pure popcorn entertainment and the 3D effects are also very
impressive.
The first two Spider-Man movies at the start of this century
were pretty good, but since then, the burned out screenplays are getting to be so
annoying (saved to an extent by the CG). Sony has planned for two more
installments in the next four years. We can only hope that at least those
movies live up to the adjective in the title.
Trailer
1 comment:
I was disappointed to the core. I had very high expectations from the film, especially after reading some high-rated reviews of the film, but i was mislead. Too many-subplots, weak villains. I wonder what will they do in the next part?
Here's my review http://movieroundup.in/amazing-spider-man-2-doesnt-leave-amazed/
Post a Comment